Friday, June 30, 2023

Virginia Satir

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Satir

Virginia Satir Change Process Model, a psychological model developed through clinical studies. Change management and organizational gurus of the 1990s and 2000s embrace this model to define how change impacts organizations.[4][5][6][7]

 Her most well-known books are Conjoint Family Therapy, 1964, Peoplemaking, 1972, and The New Peoplemaking, 1988.

Conjoint Family Therapy, 1964
Peoplemaking, 1972
The New Peoplemaking, 1988.

When Satir was three years old, she taught herself to read and by age nine, she had read all of the books in the library of her small one-room school. From early years, Satir demonstrated an interest in family dynamics. When she was five, she decided that she would grow up to be "a children's detective on parents, inclinations that would later become true through her therapeutic practices."[8] She later explained that "I didn't quite know what I would look for, but I realized a lot went on in families that didn't meet the eye."[8]

During her time as a schoolteacher, she recognized that involved and supportive parents not only help students in the classroom but could also heal family dynamics. Satir began meeting and cooperating with the parents of her students and saw the family system as a reflection of the world at large, stating "if we can heal the family, we can heal the world" [8]

One of Satir's most novel ideas at the time, was that the "presenting issue" or "surface problem" itself was seldom the real problem; rather, how people coped with the issue created the problem."[9] 

 As she said (Align, 1988, p. 20): "The family is a microcosm. By knowing how to heal the family, I know how to heal the world."

 Changing With Families ( Science and Behavior Books)
 Changing With Families : A Book About Further Education for Being Human
Satir V; Bandler R; Grinder J (1976). Changing with families. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books. ISBN 0-8314-0051-X.

Steve Andreas, one of Bandler and Grinder's students, wrote Virginia Satir: The Patterns of Her Magic (1991) in which he summarized the major patterns of Satir's work, and then showed how Satir applied them in a richly annotated verbatim transcript of a videotaped session titled "Forgiving Parents".

Virginia Satir: The Patterns of Her Magic (1991)

Satir V; Gomori M; Banmen J; Gerber JS (1991). The Satir model: family therapy and beyond. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books. ISBN 0-8314-0078-1.

Englander-Golden; P; Satir, V. Say It Straight: From Compulsions to Choices, Science and Behavior Books, Palo Alto, CA 1991. ISBN 9780831400743

http://www.psychologistanywhereanytime.com/famous_psychologist_and_psychologists/psychologist_famous_virginia_satir.htm

https://www.ihlrn.org/

http://www.super-business.net/Knowledge-Management/788.html

Satir model: yesterday, and today, contemporary family therapy 
https://doi.org/10.1023%2FA%3A1014365304082
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contemporary_Family_Therapy

https://web.archive.org/web/20120920013324/http://change-management-toolbook.com/mod/book/view.php?id=74

[[ unverify ]]
[[ download pdf? yes ]]
https://www.nccmt.ca/uploads/media/media/0001/03/1a75f61d353397066eb0e83a0da69d2fd8ee2ef4.pdf


http://www.psychotherapynetworker.org/magazine/populartopics/219-the-top-10

http://erickson-foundation.org/download/newsletters/Vol-26-No-2.pdf

[[ up 6/30/2023  10:50 PM ]]

https://satirglobal.org/product/i-am-me-poster/

http://satirpacific.org/

http://www.sayitstraight.org/
   ____________________________________
https://www.goodtherapy.org/learn-about-therapy/types/satir-transformational-systemic-therapy

Satir Transformational Systemic Therapy (STST), also known as the Satir method

THEORY OF THE SATIR METHOD
The foundational concept of STST is the belief all people are connected through a universal Life Energy, which can be accessed to achieve transformational change, develop and strengthen relationships, change behaviors, and develop positive life energy.

A few other important ideas guiding STST include but are not limited to the following:  

 • All people are innately good and have positive Life Energy at their core.
 • Human beings experience themselves through the same universal processes: feeling, thinking, doing, expecting, yearning, and connecting spiritually. 
 • All people possess the necessary coping resources to face life’s challenges, though some may have yet to access these resources or may view any or all of them negatively.
 • Problems stem from the ways people cope with them, not the problems themselves. In other words, the “problem” is not actually the problem. 
 • Treatment should focus on health, possibilities, and hope, not on pathology and problems, and treatment should utilize Life Energy to facilitate the natural healing process.
 • Everyone has the ability to change. Even if external change is restricted or limited due to factors beyond an individual’s control, internal change can still be achieved.  
 • While we cannot change what happened in the past, we can change how those past events affect us in the present. By resolving past trauma we can live with more positive energy.
 • People always do the best they can at any given time. Even destructive or otherwise negative behaviors serve to indicate the best coping possible at that time. 
 • We are in charge of our emotions. We can choose to hold onto positive feelings which provide validation and let go of negative feelings. 

According to the Satir model, the pain people experience is the result of the way they manage their perceptions, expectations, emotions, and behaviors. By focusing on three primary areas—the Intrapsychic System, the Interactive System, and the Family of Origin System—people can examine their experiences and relationships, develop goals, and work toward change.  
   ____________________________________

un helicopter shootdown friendly fire 1994

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Black_Hawk_shootdown_incident

The 1994 Black Hawk shootdown incident, sometimes referred to as the Black Hawk Incident, was a friendly fire incident over northern Iraq that occurred on 14 April 1994 during Operation Provide Comfort (OPC). The pilots of two United States Air Force (USAF) F-15 fighter aircraft, operating under the control of a USAF airborne warning and control system (AWACS) aircraft, misidentified two United States Army UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters as Iraqi Mil Mi-24 "Hind" helicopters. The F-15 pilots fired on and destroyed both helicopters, killing all 26 military and civilians aboard, including personnel from the United States, United Kingdom, France, Turkey, and the Kurdish community.

Fogleman's investigation led to several of the officers involved in the incident receiving further administrative discipline. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) subsequently refused U.S. Senate subpoenas for four USAF officers to be interviewed for the Senate investigation, which was never publicly released. The U.S. House investigation, conducted in part by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), found that the military investigative and judicial systems had operated mostly as designed, but also noted that the DoD had refused access to key witnesses.


GAO investigation
In September 1995 the House National Security Subcommittee on Military Personnel, chaired by Bob Dornan, requested that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) conduct its own investigation into the shootdown incident. Specifically, the GAO was asked to determine if the USAF accident investigation board had met its objectives, if the subsequent military justice investigations had followed established guidelines, and if the DoD and/or USAF had improperly or unlawfully influenced these investigations.[64]

The GAO released its investigation report on 12 November 1997. The investigation determined that the USAF accident investigation was properly convened and met its assigned objectives. The GAO report, however, found that the USAF investigation had failed to note that Wickson and May neglected to report their contact with unidentified aircraft to the Duke (Martin) aboard the AWACS as required by the ROE. Furthermore, the USAF investigation report incorrectly stated that Martin had no authority to terminate the engagement when, in fact, he did. The GAO report added that the failure of Wickson and May to report their contact to Martin was indicative of a well-known, general lack of discipline among F-15 aircrews involved in OPC and this was not discussed in the USAF report.[65]


The GAO investigation also uncovered evidence that a rivalry between F-15 and F-16 pilots may have contributed to Wickson's and May's "urgency to engage hostile aircraft" but was not discussed in the USAF investigation.[66] During the GAO's investigation, USAF OPC officers confirmed that the rivalry between the F-15 and F-16 communities was particularly pronounced and intense partly due to the fact that F-16 aircraft had scored all the air-to-air combat kills in Iraq and Bosnia since the end of the Gulf War. Pilkington stated to the GAO that "the shootdown pilots' haste was due in part to the planned entry of two F-16s into the TAOR 10 to 15 minutes after the F-15s and that if the F-15 pilots had involved the chain of command, the pace would have slowed down, ruining the pilots' chances for a shootdown."


The GAO investigation also uncovered evidence that a rivalry between F-15 and F-16 pilots may have contributed to Wickson's and May's "urgency to engage hostile aircraft" but was not discussed in the USAF investigation.[66] During the GAO's investigation, USAF OPC officers confirmed that the rivalry between the F-15 and F-16 communities was particularly pronounced and intense partly due to the fact that F-16 aircraft had scored all the air-to-air combat kills in Iraq and Bosnia since the end of the Gulf War. Pilkington stated to the GAO that "the shootdown pilots' haste was due in part to the planned entry of two F-16s into the TAOR 10 to 15 minutes after the F-15s and that if the F-15 pilots had involved the chain of command, the pace would have slowed down, ruining the pilots' chances for a shootdown." The GAO concluded that if the evidence of a lack of mission discipline by Wickson and May had been included in the USAF report, such information "could have been useful in subsequent administrative and disciplinary actions."[67]

Another aspect the GAO investigation revealed was that the training F-15 pilots received for identifying helicopters was not adequate. Visual ID training was accomplished by reviewing slides on a 35mm projector. Helicopters made up only about 5% of the training slides and nearly all the pictures depicted helicopters from the ground looking up because the pictures were provided by the U.S. Army. Investigators also learned from interviewing other F-15 pilots that helicopter recognition was not regarded as an important skill within the F-15 pilot community because helicopters are not considered a threat to F-15s in air-to-air combat.[68]

The GAO found no evidence of improper or unlawful command influence by USAF leaders on the investigation or subsequent administrative and military justice actions. The GAO noted, however, that it was unable to obtain complete confirmation of this finding because the DoD denied the GAO request to interview key USAF officials including Santarelli, Dallager, Starr, and Mangin.[69]



   ____________________________________

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-OSI-98-4/pdf/GAOREPORTS-OSI-98-4.pdf

Aircraft accident investigation board
President's opinion

3. statement of opinion

Under 10 U.S.C. 2254 (D) any opinion of accident investigation as to the cause of, or the factors contributing to the accident set forth in the accident investigation report, may not be considered as evidence in any civil or criminal proceeding arising from an aircraft accident, nor may such information be considered an admission of liability by the United States or by any person referred to in those conclusions or statements 

   Operation Provide Comfort (OPC)  has been a successful coalition effort in response to human rights abuses against the Kurdish population in northern Iraq.   The operation has effectively deterred Iraq from disrupting peace and order in the UN-established security zone.

   THe 14 April 1994 shoot-down of two (2) US Black hawk helicopters by two (2) US F-15c aircraft in northern Iraq was caused by a chain of events which began with the breakdown of clear guidance from the Combined Task force (CTF) to its component organizations.  This resulted in the lack of a clear understanding among the components of their respective responsibilities.  Consequently, CTF (combined task force) component organizations did not fully integrate Military Coordination Center helicopter activities wit other OPC air operations in the Tactical Area of Responsibility [TAOR].  ([ no communication, mis communication, communication breakdown, no talking, they fight with and against each other, broken family (community), broken family (community) get people killed, unproductive rivalry and competition (...) leads to death ]) 
Additionally, OPC personnel did not receive consistent, comprehensive training to ensure they had a thorough understanding of the USEUCOM-directed ROE (rule of engagement).  As a result, some aircrews' understanding of how the approved ROE should be applied, became over-simplified. 

   MCC (military coordination center)  were given a high degree of independence in helicopter operations, without an adequate consideration for the threat of engagement from other OPC aircraft.  Neither the CFC (combined task force) staff nor the Combined Forces air component staff requested or received timely, detailed flight information on planned MCC helicopter activities in the TAOR [Tactical Area of Responsibility].  Consequently, the OPC daily Air Tasking Order (ATO) was published with little detailed information regarding US helicopter flight activities over nothern Iraq.  Specific information on routes of flights and times of MCC helicopter activity in the TAOR [Tactical Area of Responsibility] was normally available to the other OPC participants only when AWACS received it from the helicopter crews by radio and relayed the information on. 

look up AWACS
airborne warning and control system (AWACS)

   The AWACS mission crew commander on 14 April 1994, who had flown only one sortie in the previous three (3) months, was not currently qualified in accordance with air force regulations.  The AWACS weapons controllers, under his supervision, did not have a clear understanding of their individual responsibilities to provide support to MCC (military coordination center) helicopters.  They shared a common view, along with the CFAC (combined forces air component staff) airborned command element officer, that MCC helicopter activities were not an integral part of OPC [Operation Provide Comfort] air operations.  There was general misunderstanding throughout OPC [Operation Provide Comfort] organizations regarding the extent to which the provisions of the Airspace Control Order (ACO) applied to MCC helicopter activities.  AWACS personnel did not routinely monitor the Black hawk helicopter flights or pass information on those flights to other OPC aircraft.  The result was that there was no effective coordination of OPC fixed-wing and helicopter operations within the TAOR [Tactical Area of Responsibility].

    On 14 April 1994, AWACS controllers were aware that the Black hawk helicopters had departed Zakhu, and were proceeding east into the TAOR [Tactical Area of Responsibility].  The F-15 pilots were not aware of the Black hawk helicopters already in the area.  The fighters twice informed AWACS that they had unknown rader contacts in the TAOR [Tactical Area of Responsibility].  The AWACS mission crew commander, senior weapons director, enroute controller and TAOR controller had access to electronic information regarding the presence of friendly aircraft in the vicinity of the F-15s' reported radar contacts.  However, there is no evidence that they were aware of, recognized, or responded to this information.  They did not advise teh F-15 pilots of the presence of friendly aircraft.  The helicopters were unable to hear the radio transmission between the F-15 flight and AWACS because they were ona different radio frequency. 

   skip two (2) paragraphs on interrogating the ATO-designated IFF mode I and mode IV aircraft codes.  See page 55/60 (pdf), Appendix I : aircraft accident investigation board, president's opinion, Review of the US air force investigation of Black hawk fratricide incident, Operation provide comfort, November 1997, GAO (us general accounting office), office of special investigation, GAO/OSI-98-4 review of USAF investigation of fratricide incident.   
   
   When the F-15 pilots were unable to get positive/consistent IFF responses they performed an intercept in oder to visually identify the "unknown" aircraft.  They each made a single identification pass on the Black hawks.  However, the identification passes were accomplished at speeds, altitudes and distances where it was unlikely that the pilots would have been able to detect the Black hawks' markings.  Neither F-15 pilot had received recent, adequate visual recognition training.  The pilots did not recognize the differences between the US black hawk helicopters with wing-mounted fuel tanks and Hind helicopters with wing-mounted weapons.  The F-15 flight lead misidentified the US black hawk as Iraqi Hind helicopters.  Following his identification pass, he asked his wingman to confirm the identification.  The wingman, who was a senior squadron supervisor and instructor pilot, saw two helicopters, but did not positively identify them as Hinds.  The wingman did not notify the flight lead that he had been unable to make a positive identification, and allowed the engagement to continue.  The flight lead, acting within the specified ROE [rule of engagement], fired a single missile and shot down the trail Black hawk helicopter.  At flight lead's direction, the F-15 wingman also fired a single missile and shot down the lead Black hawk helicopter.  


[[signature]] 
James G. Andrus
Maj Gen, USAF
Board President 

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-OSI-98-4/pdf/GAOREPORTS-OSI-98-4.pdf
   ____________________________________
   ____________________________________
from everything you've read, were the followings questions satisfy? 
    what happened?
    how did it happened?
    why did it happened?
    who was involved?
is this a complete story? 
is this story interesting? 
should more people know about this story?  
can this be made into a good screenplay?
   ____________________________________













Sunday, June 11, 2023

Gary Webb (wire) (1987 DEA)

 the following is a compilation of fiction, except where it is not (the reader get to decide, some times you have a choice, some times you do not)

Gary Webb (wire) (1987 DEA)
CIA connections to drug trafficking

  ── This is from a 1987 DEA report:  „ ...  Torres told DEA Confidential Informant 1 that CIA representatives are aware of his drug-related activities, and that they don't mind. He said they had gone so far as to encourage cocaine trafficking by members of the contras, because they know it's a good source of income. Some of this money has gone into numbered accounts in Europe and Panama, as does the money that goes to Managua from cocaine trafficking.  ...“
    ── CIA Connections to Contra Drug Trafficking
       Journalist Gary Webb — January 16, 1999
        https://ourhiddenhistory.org/
        http://www.whale.to/b/webb10.html
    ── Dark Alliance author Gary Webb gave a fascinating talk on the evening of January 16, outlining the findings of his investigation of the CIA's connection to drug trafficking by the Nicaraguan contras. 
       First United Methodist Church in Eugene, Oregon

    you have to sign in to confirm your age to watch this
       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO6oMN8idUQ
   ____________________________________
    what happened?
    how did it happened?
    why did it happened?
    who was involved?
   ____________________________________

https://ourhiddenhistory.org/

http://www.whale.to/b/webb10.html  (verify to be up on 6/11/2023 16:52)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO6oMN8idUQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO6oMN8idUQ

CIA Connections to Contra Drug Trafficking
Journalist Gary Webb — January 16, 1999

Dark Alliance author Gary Webb gave a fascinating talk on the evening of January 16, outlining the findings of his investigation of the CIA's connection to drug trafficking by the Nicaraguan contras. Approximately 300 people, crowded into the First United Methodist Church in Eugene, Oregon, listened with rapt attention as Webb detailed his experiences. Webb's riveting speech was followed by an intense question-and-answer session, during which he candidly answered questions about the "Dark Alliance" controversy, his firing from the San Jose Mercury News, and CIA/contra/cocaine secrets that still await revelation. ORIGINAL: http://www.whale.to/b/webb10.html

  ...  ...  ... 
  ...  ...  ... 

The other more palatable reason which in my mind comes closer to the truth, is that someone started bringing cheap cocaine into black neighborhoods right at the time when drug users began figuring out how to turn it into crack. And this allowed black drug dealers to get a head start on every other ethnic group in terms of setting up distribution systems and trafficking systems.

Now, one thing I've learned about the drug business while researching this is that in many ways it is the epitome of capitalism. It is the purest form of capitalism. You have no government regulation, a wide-open market, a buyer's market -- anything goes. But these things don't spring out of the ground fully formed. It's like any business. It takes time to grow them. It takes time to set up networks. So once these distribution networks got set up and established in primarily South Central Los Angeles, primarily black neighborhoods, they spread it along ethnic and cultural lines. You had black dealers from LA going to black neighborhoods in other cities, because they knew people there, they had friends there, and that's why you saw these networks pop up from one black neighborhood to another black neighborhood.

Now, exactly the same thing happened on the east coast a couple of years later. When crack first appeared on the east coast, it appeared in Caribbean neighborhoods in Miami -- thanks largely to the Jamaicans, who were using their drug profits to fund political gains back home. It was almost the exact opposite of what happened in LA in that the politics were the opposite -- but it was the same phenomenon. And once the Miami market was saturated, they moved to New York, they moved east, and they started bringing crack from the east coast towards the middle of the country.

So it seems to me that if you're looking for the root of your drug problems in a neighborhood, nothing else matters except the drugs, and where they're coming from, and how they're getting there. And all these other reasons I cited are used as explanations for how crack became popular, but it doesn't explain how the cocaine got there in the first place. And that's where the contras came in.

  ...  ...  ... 

"I am more convinced than ever that the U.S. government's responsibility for the drug problems in ... inner cities is greater than I ever wrote in the newspaper."

After spending three years of my life looking into this, I am more convinced than ever that the U.S. government's responsibility for the drug problems in South Central Los Angeles and other inner cities is greater than I ever wrote in the newspaper.
   ____________________________________
https://allthatsinteresting.com/gary-webb
https://www.textise.net/showText.aspx?strURL=https%253A//allthatsinteresting.com/gary-webb

How Gary Webb Linked The CIA To The Crack Epidemic — And Paid The Ultimate Price
By Marco Margaritoff
Published December 5, 2019
Updated February 18, 2022
Gary Webb's "Dark Alliance" series boldly claimed the CIA knew about a U.S. drug trafficking scheme that ravaged the country's inner cities to fund Nicaragua's Contra rebels. Years later, he shot himself in the head.

In a three-part exposé, investigative journalist Gary Webb reported that a guerrilla army in Nicaragua had used crack cocaine sales in Los Angeles’ black neighborhoods to fund an attempted coup of Nicaragua’s socialist government in the 1980s — and that the CIA had purposefully funded it.

It sounds like a Tom Clancy novel, right? Except it actually happened.

  ...  ...  ... 

In a written statement to obtain a search warrant for Blandón’s sprawling cocaine operation, L.A. County sheriff’s Sergeant Tom Gordon confirmed that local drug agents knew about Blandón’s involvement with the CIA-backed Contras — all the way back in the mid-1980s:

“Danilo Blandon is in charge of a sophisticated cocaine smuggling and distribution organization operating in Southern California… The monies gained from the sales of cocaine are transported to Florida and laundered through Orlando Murillo, who is a high-ranking officer of a chain of banks in Florida named Government Securities Corporation. From this bank the monies are filtered to the contra rebels to buy arms in the war in Nicaragua.”

 ── chain of banks in Florida named Government Securities Corporation
([ drug trafficking has always been linked to money laudering ])
([ money laudering is a method for hiding the source of the money ])
([ once the money is laundered, in practice, it should be ... difficult to trace the [original] source where the money come from, it does not have to be illegal; ...])
([ what if you laundered the money twice, can it still be traced?  if you can put someone and recruit a someone from the inside; yes, money laundering can be traced; the u.s. treasury and the justice department does it all the time; what if you laundered the money in the offshore banking system, can that still be traced, it becomes more difficult, and yes, even that can be traced if the stream or flow are targeted by the agency (department, organization, unit, ...); ... ])
  ...  ...  ... 
   ____________________________________

         Panama - international banking center for drug money - banking
      Nicaragua - a trans shipment point 
Central America - a trans shipment point - the planes needed a place to refuel
      Columbia, - [drug producers] 
          Peru, - [drug producers]      
    and Bolivia - [drug] producers  


source: 
        https://ourhiddenhistory.org/
        http://www.whale.to/b/webb10.html

CIA Connections to Contra Drug Trafficking
Journalist Gary Webb — January 16, 1999

Dark Alliance author Gary Webb gave a fascinating talk on the evening of January 16, outlining the findings of his investigation of the CIA's connection to drug trafficking by the Nicaraguan contras. Approximately 300 people, crowded into the First United Methodist Church in Eugene, Oregon, listened with rapt attention as Webb detailed his experiences. Webb's riveting speech was followed by an intense question-and-answer session, during which he candidly answered questions about the "Dark Alliance" controversy, his firing from the San Jose Mercury News, and CIA/contra/cocaine secrets that still await revelation. ORIGINAL: http://www.whale.to/b/webb10.html

  ...  ...  ... 
  ...  ...  ... 

 ── Well, what Noriega had done was sort of create an international banking center for drug money. That was his part of it. Nicaragua was nothing ever than just a trans-shipment point. Central America was never anything more than a trans-shipment point. Columbia Peru and Bolivia were the producers, and the planes needed a place to refuel, and that's all that Central America ever was. The banking was all done in Panama.
  ...  ...  ... 
   ____________________________________

https://ourhiddenhistory.org/
http://www.whale.to/b/webb10.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO6oMN8idUQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO6oMN8idUQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO6oMN8idUQ&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fourhiddenhistory.org%2F&feature=emb_imp_woyt

CIA Connections to Contra Drug Trafficking
Journalist Gary Webb — January 16, 1999

Dark Alliance author Gary Webb gave a fascinating talk on the evening of January 16, outlining the findings of his investigation of the CIA's connection to drug trafficking by the Nicaraguan contras. Approximately 300 people, crowded into the First United Methodist Church in Eugene, Oregon, listened with rapt attention as Webb detailed his experiences. Webb's riveting speech was followed by an intense question-and-answer session, during which he candidly answered questions about the "Dark Alliance" controversy, his firing from the San Jose Mercury News, and CIA/contra/cocaine secrets that still await revelation. ORIGINAL: http://www.whale.to/b/webb10.html

  ...  ...  ... 
  ...  ...  ... 

 ── One of the people said, well geez, what was the CIA's responsibility when they found out about this? What were you guys supposed to do? And the Inspector General sort of looked around nervously, cleared his throat and said, "Well... that's kind of an odd history there." And Norman Dix from Washington, bless his heart, didn't let it go at that. He said, "Explain what you mean by that?" And the Inspector General said, well, we were looking around and we found this document, and according to the document, we didn't have to report this to anybody. And they said, "How come?" And the IG said, we don't know exactly, but there was an agreement made in 1982 between Bill Casey -- a fine American, as we all know [laughter from the audience] -- and William French Smith, who was then the Attorney General of the United States. And they reached an agreement that said if there is drug trafficking involved by CIA agents, we don't have to tell the Justice Department. Honest to God. Honest to God. Actually, this is now a public record, this document. 
  ...  ...  ... 

 ── Attorney General of the United States, William French Smith, knew about CIA agents engaging in drug trafficking 

The other thing about this agreement was, this wasn't just like a thirty-day agreement -- this thing stayed in effect from 1982 until 1995. So all these years, these agencies had a gentleman's agreement that if CIA assets or CIA agents were involved in drug trafficking, it did not need to be reported to the Justice Department.
  ...  ...  ... 

 ── there is an agreement that stayed in effect from 1982 until 1995, that if CIA assets or CIA agents were involved in drug trafficking, it [the CIA?] did not need to be reported to the Justice Department. 
 ── This is from a 1987 DEA report. And this is about this drug ring in Los Angeles that I wrote about. In 1987, the DEA sent undercover informants inside this drug operation, and they interviewed one of the principals of this organization, namely Ivan Torres. And this is what he said. He told the informant:
     "The CIA wants to know about drug trafficking, but only for their own purposes, and not necessarily for the use of law enforcement agencies. Torres told DEA Confidential Informant 1 that CIA representatives are aware of his drug-related activities, and that they don't mind. He said they had gone so far as to encourage cocaine trafficking by members of the contras, because they know it's a good source of income. Some of this money has gone into numbered accounts in Europe and Panama, as does the money that goes to Managua from cocaine trafficking. Torres told the informant about receiving counterintelligence training from the CIA, and had avowed that the CIA looks the other way and in essence allows them to engage in narcotics trafficking."
 ── This is from a 1987 DEA report:  „ ...  Torres told DEA Confidential Informant 1 that CIA representatives are aware of his drug-related activities, and that they don't mind. He said they had gone so far as to encourage cocaine trafficking by members of the contras, because they know it's a good source of income. Some of this money has gone into numbered accounts in Europe and Panama, as does the money that goes to Managua from cocaine trafficking.  ...“
 ── Some of this money has gone into numbered accounts in Europe and Panama, as does the money that goes to Managua from cocaine trafficking. 
 ── receiving counterintelligence training from the CIA
  ...  ...  ... 

 ── Well, what Noriega had done was sort of create an international banking center for drug money. That was his part of it. Nicaragua was nothing ever than just a trans-shipment point. Central America was never anything more than a trans-shipment point. Columbia Peru and Bolivia were the producers, and the planes needed a place to refuel, and that's all that Central America ever was. The banking was all done in Panama.
  ...  ...  ... 
   ____________________________________

https://ourhiddenhistory.org/
http://www.whale.to/b/webb10.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO6oMN8idUQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO6oMN8idUQ

CIA Connections to Contra Drug Trafficking
Journalist Gary Webb — January 16, 1999

Dark Alliance author Gary Webb gave a fascinating talk on the evening of January 16, outlining the findings of his investigation of the CIA's connection to drug trafficking by the Nicaraguan contras. Approximately 300 people, crowded into the First United Methodist Church in Eugene, Oregon, listened with rapt attention as Webb detailed his experiences. Webb's riveting speech was followed by an intense question-and-answer session, during which he candidly answered questions about the "Dark Alliance" controversy, his firing from the San Jose Mercury News, and CIA/contra/cocaine secrets that still await revelation. ORIGINAL: http://www.whale.to/b/webb10.html

  ...  ...  ... 
  ...  ...  ... 

What I've attempted to demonstrate in my book was how the collapse of a brutal, pro-American dictatorship in Latin America, combined with a decision by corrupt CIA agents to raise money for a resistance movement by any means necessary, led to the formation of the nation's first major crack market in South Central Los Angeles, which led to the arming and the empowerment of LA's street gangs, which led to the spread of crack to black neighborhoods across the country, and to the passage of racially discriminatory sentencing laws that are locking up thousands of young black men today behind bars for most of their lives.

But it's not so much a conspiracy as a chain reaction. And that's what my whole book is about, this chain reaction. So let me explain the links in this chain a little better.

The first link is this fellow Anastasio Somoza, who was an American-educated tyrant, one of our buddies naturally, and his family ruled Nicaragua for forty years -- thanks to the Nicaraguan National Guard, which we supplied, armed, and funded, because we thought they were, you know, anti-communists.

Well, in 1979, the people of Nicaragua got tired of living under this dictatorship, and they rose up and overthrew it. And a lot of Somoza's friends and relatives and business partners came to the United States, because we had been their allies all these years, including two men whose families had been very close to the dictatorship. And these two guys are sort of two of the three main characters in my book -- a fellow named Danilo Blandón, and a fellow named Norwin Meneses.

a fellow named Danilo Blandón, and a fellow named Norwin Meneses.

They came to the United States in 1979, along with a flood of other Nicaraguan immigrants, most of them middle-class people, most of them former bankers, former insurance salesmen -- sort of a capitalist exodus from Nicaragua. And they got involved when they got here, and they decided they were going to take the country back, they didn't like the fact that they'd been forced out of their country. So they formed these resistance organizations here in the United States, and they began plotting how they were going to kick the Sandanistas out.

At this point in time, Jimmy Carter was president, and Carter wasn't all that interested in helping these folks out. The CIA was, however. And that's where we start getting into this murky world of, you know, who really runs the United States. Is it the president? Is it the bureaucracy? Is it the intelligence community? At different points in time you get different answers. Like today, the idea that Clinton runs the United States is nuts. The idea that Jimmy Carter ran the country is nuts.

In 1979 and 1980, the CIA secretly began visiting these groups that were setting up here in the United States, supplying them with a little bit of money, and telling them to hold on, wait for a little while, don't give up. And Ronald Reagan came to town. And Reagan had a very different outlook on Central America than Carter did. Reagan saw what happened in Nicaragua not as a populist uprising, as most of the rest of the world did. He saw it as this band of communists down there, there was going to be another Fidel Castro, and he was going to have another Cuba in his backyard. Which fit in very well with the CIA's thinking. So, the CIA under Reagan got it together, and they said, "We're going to help these guys out." They authorized $19 million to fund a covert war to destabilize the government in Nicaragua and help get their old buddies back in power.

Soon after the CIA took over this operation, these two drug traffickers, who had come from Nicaragua and settled in California, were called down to Honduras. And they met with a CIA agent named Enrique Bermúdez, who was one of Somoza's military officials, and the man the CIA picked to run this new organization they were forming. And both traffickers had said -- one of them said, the other one wrote, and it's never been contradicted -- that when they met with the CIA agent, he told them, "We need money for this operation. Your guy's job is to go to California and raise money, and not to worry about how you did it. And what he said was -- and I think this had been used to justify just about every crime against humanity that we've known -- "the ends justify the means."

CIA agent named Enrique Bermúdez

Now, this is a very important link in this chain reaction, because the means they selected was cocaine trafficking, which is sort of what you'd expect when you ask cocaine traffickers to go out and raise money for you. You shouldn't at all be surprised when they go out and sell drugs. Especially when you pick people who are like pioneers of the cocaine trafficking business, which Norwin Meneses certainly was.

There was a CIA cable from I believe 1984, which called him the "kingpin of narcotics trafficking" in Central America. He was sort of like the Al Capone of Nicaragua. So after getting these fundraising instructions from this CIA agent, these two men go back to California, and they begin selling cocaine. This time not exclusively for themselves -- this time in furtherance of U.S. foreign policy. And they began selling it in Los Angeles, and they began selling it in San Francisco.

Sometime in 1982, Danilo Blandón, who had been given the LA market, started selling his cocaine to a young drug dealer named Ricky Ross, who later became known as "Freeway" Rick. In 1994, the LA Times would describe him as the master marketer most responsible for flooding the streets of Los Angeles with cocaine. In 1979, he was nothing. He was nothing before he met these Nicaraguans. He was a high school dropout. He was a kid who wanted to be a tennis star, who was trying to get a tennis scholarship, but he found out that in order to get a scholarship you needed to read and write, and he couldn't. So he drifted out of school and wound up selling stolen car parts, and then he met these Nicaraguans, who had this cheap cocaine that they wanted to unload. And he proved to be very good at that.

Now, he lived in South Central Los Angeles, which was home to some street gangs known as the Crips and the Bloods. And back in 1981-82, hardly anybody knew who they were. They were mainly neighborhood kids -- they'd beat each other up, they'd steal leather coats, they'd steal cars, but they were really nothing back then. But what they gained through this organization, and what they gained through Ricky Ross, was a built-in distribution network throughout the neighborhood. The Crips and the Bloods were already selling marijuana, they were already selling PCP, so it wasn't much of a stretch for them to sell something new, which is what these Nicaraguans were bringing in, which was cocaine.

This is where these forces of history come out of nowhere and collide. Right about the time the contras got to South Central Los Angeles, hooked up with "Freeway" Rick, and started selling powder cocaine, the people Rick was selling his powder to started asking him if he knew how to make it into this stuff called "rock" that they were hearing about. This obviously was crack cocaine, and it was already on its way to the United States by then -- it started in Peru in '74 and was working its way upward, and it was bound to get here sooner or later. In 1981 it got to Los Angeles, and people started figuring out how to take this very expensive powdered cocaine and cook it up on the stove and turn it into stuff you could smoke.

When Ricky went out and he started talking to his customers, and they started asking him how to make this stuff, you know, Rick was a smart guy -- he still is a smart guy -- and he figured, this is something new. This is customer demand. If I want to progress in this business, I better meet this demand. So he started switching from selling powder to making rock himself, and selling it already made. He called this new invention his "Ready Rock." And he told me the scenario, he said it was a situation where he'd go to a guy's house, he would say, "Oh man, I want to get high, I'm on my way to work, I don't have time to go into the kitchen and cook this stuff up. Can't you cook it up for me and just bring it to me already made?" And he said, "Yeah, I can do that." So he started doing it.

So by the time crack got a hold of South Central, which took a couple of years, Rick had positioned himself on top of the crack market in South Central. And by 1984, crack sales had supplanted marijuana and PCP sales as sources of income for the gangs and drug dealers of South Central. And suddenly these guys had more money than they knew what to do with. Because what happened with crack, it democratized the drug. When you were buying it in powdered form, you were having to lay out a hundred bucks for a gram, or a hundred and fifty bucks for a gram. Now all you needed was ten bucks, or five bucks, or a dollar -- they were selling "dollar rocks" at one point. So anybody who had money and wanted to get high could get some of this stuff. You didn't need to be a middle-class or wealthy drug user anymore.

Suddenly the market for this very expensive drug expanded geometrically. And now these dealers, who were making a hundred bucks a day on a good day, were now making five or six thousand dollars a day on a good day. And the gangs started setting up franchises -- they started franchising rock houses in South Central, just like McDonald's. And you'd go on the streets, and there'd be five or six rock houses owned by one guy, and five or six rock houses owned by another guy, and suddenly they started making even more money.

'The contras. They were selling weapons and were buying weapons. And they started selling weapons to the gangs in Los Angeles."
And now they've got all this money, and they felt nervous. You get $100,000 or $200,000 in cash in your house, and you start getting kind of antsy about it. So now they wanted weapons to guard their money with, and to guard their rock houses, which other people were starting to knock off. And lo and behold, you had weapons. The contras. They were selling weapons. They were buying weapons. And they started selling weapons to the gangs in Los Angeles. They started selling them AR-15s, they started selling them Uzis, they started selling them Israeli-made pistols with laser sights, just about anything. Because that was part of the process here. They were not just drug dealers, they were taking the drug money and buying weapons with it to send down to Central America with the assistance of a great number of spooky CIA folks, who were getting them [audio glitch -- "across the border"?] and that sort of thing, so they could get weapons in and out of the country. So, not only does South Central suddenly have a drug problem, they have a weapons problem that they never had before. And you started seeing things like drive-by shootings and gang bangers with Uzis.

 ── South Central [Los Angeles] suddenly have a drug problem
 ── South Central [Los Angeles] have a weapons problem that they never had before.
     ── the need for weapons to protect your asset (what kind of asset?)

By 1985, the LA crack market had become saturated. There was so much dope going into South Central, dope that the CIA, we now know, knew of, and they knew the origins of -- the FBI knew the origins of it; the DEA knew the origins of it; and nobody did anything about it. (We'll get into that in a bit.)
But what happened was, there were so many people selling crack that the dealers were jostling each other on the corners. And the smaller ones decided, we're going to take this show on the road. So they started going to other cities. They started going to Bakersfield, they started going to Fresno, they started going to San Francisco and Oakland, where they didn't have crack markets, and nobody knew what this stuff was, and they had wide open markets for themselves. And suddenly crack started showing up in city after city after city, and oftentimes it was Crips and Bloods from Los Angeles who were starting these markets. By 1986, it was all up and down the east coast, and by 1989, it was nationwide.

 ── There was so much dope going into South central los angeles  
    ── dope that the CIA, we now know, knew of, and they knew the origins of
    ── FBI knew the origins of it; 
    ── the DEA knew the origins of it;

Today, fortunately, crack use is on a downward trend, but that's something that isn't due to any great progress we've made in the so-called "War on Drugs," it's the natural cycle of things. Drug epidemics generally run from 10 to 15 years. Heroin is now the latest drug on the upswing.

Now, a lot of people disagreed with this scenario. 
  ...  ...  ... 

https://ourhiddenhistory.org/
http://www.whale.to/b/webb10.html
   ____________________________________
 ── “ ... I mean, part of the problem is that the media often times believes its own propaganda. And one of the biggest propaganda efforts that I came across in the story was the idea that crack happened overnight, that in 1986 suddenly we woke up one morning and we were engulfed by this tidal wave of crack. And that’s pretty much the prevailing media belief to this day, which, you know, it’s nonsense. I mean, it started very slowly and started in South Central [Los Angeles], and it took years to spread to other cities. So, I mean, I think Ceppos and I just disagree on the whole epidemiology of crack. ...” (Gary Webb)
    ── https://www.democracynow.org/1997/5/14/san_jose_mercury_news_editor_claims
   ____________________________________

AMY GOODMAN and JUAN GONZÁLEZ interview GARY WEBB on democracynow.com 
 ── the story is essentially true
 ── Nicaraguan contra were selling cocaine in South central los angeles 
 ── they were selling large quantities of it 
 ── the money from the sales of drugs were going to the war effort. 
 ── we have solid documentation 
 ── couriers drug ring: $5 million to $6 million down in one year alone, in 1982.
 ── direct CIA involvement with this drug operation.
 ── high-level CIA knowledge of at least portions of this drug operation.
 ── pressure from the DEA not to print information about Danilo Blandón
 ── Danilo Blandón, known drug traffickers
 ── Danilo Blandón, became a DEA informant (info not from democracy now Gary Webb interview)
 ── only five tons of cocaine sold by these folks down in South Central.
 ── Brian Barger and Bob Parry, did their Nicaraguan contra cocaine stories back in the ’80s
 ── expanding crack epidemic spread primarily through the gangs. 
 ── federal government reports: evidence of Crip crack dealing and Blood crack dealing in 45 cities in 32 states. 
 ── The truth is we were more right than we knew.
 ── We interviewed pilots that were flying this cocaine in and out of the country. 
 ── courier: We interviewed the man who was taking the money down there [Nicaragua]. 
 ── the paper’s come out with this strange column, which says that we don’t have information that we do have.
 ── https://www.democracynow.org/1997/5/14/san_jose_mercury_news_editor_claims
   ____________________________________
facts on the ground
how did the facts on the ground came to be 
as a matter of fact, we manufactured reality all the time. 
for example, if there was no hole, we can go dig a hole
once a hole is digged, we can say, for a fact, there is a hole.
the fact that there is a hole in the ground does not explain, how did the hole got there; 
in many to all cases, how a thing happen is where the story get interesting, whether in real life or in fiction; ... 
in another example, it is a fact that there is birth, there is living or life, and then there is death; those are the facts; what is interesting is how are we born, how is living, and how did we died; that is the story. 
   ____________________________________
get the facts, what happened? 
then ask the interesting question, how did it happened? 
   ____________________________________
first get the story
does the story work
does the story tells the reader what happen
is the story true
is the story interesting
abstract the story; don't get attached to the label, the name, the date, the places; what is the pattern or the structure of the story; like, for example, the role that the person played in the scenario; can this happened in other country, in other places; ... 
  is there a viable screenplay to be made from this story
  ([ they already made at least two movies related to this ])
   ____________________________________

        the first private awareness that human error is a symptom of trouble deeper inside a system, and to explain that failure, do not try to find where the people went wrong; instead, find out how people's assessments and actions made sense at the time, given the circumstances that surrounded them; What were they thinking? - “The reconstruction of the mindset begins not with the mind. It begins with the circumstances in which the mind found itself.”, Dekker (2002);--Heather Parker, Transport Canada slide presentation, titled, Investigating and Analysing Human and Organizational Factors, 2006-11-09;      

 ── the first private awareness that [CIA complicits in drug trafficking] is a symptom of trouble deeper inside a system, and to explain that failure, do not try to find where the people went wrong; instead, find out how people's assessments and actions made sense at the time, given the circumstances that surrounded them; What were they thinking? - “The reconstruction of the mindset begins not with the mind. It begins with the circumstances in which the mind found itself.”, Dekker (2002);--Heather Parker, Transport Canada slide presentation, titled, Investigating and Analysing Human and Organizational Factors, 2006-11-09;      
 ── the first private awareness that [the CIA, the DEA, the FBI, the department of Justice, their knowledge of the CIA's complicity in drug trafficking, and being complicit to the CIA operation in Nicaragua] is a symptom of trouble deeper inside a system, and to explain that failure, do not try to find where the people went wrong; instead, find out how people's assessments and actions made sense at the time, given the circumstances that surrounded them; What were they thinking? - “The reconstruction of the mindset begins not with the mind. It begins with the circumstances in which the mind found itself.”, Dekker (2002);--Heather Parker, Transport Canada slide presentation, titled, Investigating and Analysing Human and Organizational Factors, 2006-11-09;      
   ____________________________________
https://ourhiddenhistory.org/
http://www.whale.to/b/webb10.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO6oMN8idUQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO6oMN8idUQ

CIA Connections to Contra Drug Trafficking
Journalist Gary Webb — January 16, 1999

Dark Alliance author Gary Webb gave a fascinating talk on the evening of January 16, outlining the findings of his investigation of the CIA's connection to drug trafficking by the Nicaraguan contras. Approximately 300 people, crowded into the First United Methodist Church in Eugene, Oregon, listened with rapt attention as Webb detailed his experiences. Webb's riveting speech was followed by an intense question-and-answer session, during which he candidly answered questions about the "Dark Alliance" controversy, his firing from the San Jose Mercury News, and CIA/contra/cocaine secrets that still await revelation. ORIGINAL: http://www.whale.to/b/webb10.html

  ...  ...  ... 

Gary Webb:   Yeah, let me sum up your question. Essentially, you're asking about the goings-on in Mena, Arkansas, because of the drug operations going on at this little air base in Arkansas while Clinton was governor down there. The fellow you referred to, Terry Reed, wrote a book called Compromised which talked about his role in this corporate operation in Mena which was initially designed to train contra pilots -- Reed was a pilot -- and it was also designed after the Boland Amendment went into effect to get weapons parts to the contras, because the CIA couldn't provide them anymore. And as Reed got into this weapons parts business, he discovered that the CIA was shipping cocaine back through these weapons crates that were coming back into the United States. And when he blew the whistle on it, he was sort of sent on this long odyssey of criminal charges being filed against him, etcetera etcetera etcetera. A lot of what Reed wrote is accurate as far as I can tell, and a lot of it was documented.

There is a House Banking Committee investigation that has been going on now for about three years, looking specifically at Mena, Arkansas, looking specifically at a drug trafficker named Barry Seal, who was one of the biggest cocaine and marijuana importers in the south side of the United States during the 1980s. Seal was also, coincidentally, working for the CIA, and was working for the Drug Enforcement Administration.

I don't know how many of you remember this, but one night Ronnie Reagan got on TV and held up a grainy picture, and said, here's proof that the Sandanistas are dealing drugs. Look, here's Pablo Escobar, and they're all loading cocaine into a plane, and this was taken in Nicaragua. This was the eve of a vote on the contra aid. That photograph was set up by Barry Seal. The plane that was used was Seal's plane, and it was the same plane that was shot down over Nicaragua a couple of years later that Eugene Hasenfus was in, that broke open the whole Iran-contra scandal.

 ── the two sides in the Nicaraguan civil war ended up using drug trafficking to fund their conflicts. (??)
 ── That photograph was set up by Barry Seal. The plane that was used was Seal's plane, and it was the same plane that was shot down over Nicaragua a couple of years later that Eugene Hasenfus was in, that broke open the whole Iran-contra scandal.
 ── the whole Iran-contra scandal make it ([what is it]) possible for us to learn about the underlying cause of crack cocaine explosion, with South central los angeles being ground zero. (??) (South central los angeles is ground zero for crack cocaine explosion - that is true; but how true or how untrue about Iran-contra scandal exposed CIA's involvement in drug trafficking, not directly, but it did)

The Banking Committee is supposed to be coming out with a report in the next couple of months looking at the relationship between Barry Seal, the U.S. government and Clinton's folks. Alex Cockburn has done a number of stories on this company called Park-On Meter down in Russellville, Arkansas, that's hooked up with Clinton's family, hooked up with Hillary's law firm, that sort of thing. To me, that's a story people ought to be looking at. I never thought Whitewater was much of a story, frankly. What I thought the story was about was Clinton's buddy Dan Lasater, the bond broker down there who was a convicted cocaine trafficker. Clinton pardoned him on his way to Washington. Lasater was a major drug trafficker, and Terry Reed's book claims Lasater was part and parcel with this whole thing.

 ── banking committee 
 ── Dan Lasater, major drug trafficker

Voice From the Audience Cockburn's newsletter is called Counterpunch, and he's done a good job of defending you in it.

Gary Webb Yeah, Cockburn has also written a book called Whiteout, which is a very interesting look at the history of CIA drug trafficking. Actually, I think it's selling pretty well itself. The New York Times hated it, of course, but what else is new?

 •── Alex Cockburn, a book called Whiteout, a interesting look at the history of CIA drug trafficking 

Audience Member #2 Well I just wanted to mention that he states also -- I guess it was Terry Reed who was actually doing the work -- he said Bush was running the whole thing as vice president.
  ...  ...  ... 
   ____________________________________
            “The law of Concentrated Benefit over Diffuse Injury can be stated as follows:”
                “A small, determined group, working energetically for its own narrow interests, can almost always impose an injustice upon a vastly larger group, provided that the larger group believes that the injury is "hypothetical," or distant-in-the-future, or real-but-small relative to the real-and-large cost of preventing it.”  
   ____________________________________

explain it to me like I am five:
•── CIA
     did the CIA do its job?  Yes
     did the CIA wander off reservation?  I don't know 
•── DEA
     did the DEA do its job?  No, Yes
     edge cases, conflict of interest, organizational goal, so-called national security trump DEA mission
•── FBI
     did the FBI do its job?  No, yes
     conflict of interest, organizational goal, again, national security interest
•── department of Justice
     did the DOJ (department of justice) did its job?  No, yes
     conflict of interest, national security, grey area, black area
•── ATF
     eh, it is legal to buy firearms in the u.s.
     how would ATF notice a rise in blackmarket firearms from drug trafficking
     during warfare when there is periodic fighting, there should be a rise in ammo purchase; we do not talk about continuous fighting, because when there is continuous fighting, that mean there is death and casualties, and that mean the body count goes up, which means, when enough people start killing each other in great number, the vicious spiral of violence start, without new body, the problem of limiting factors come into play, which means, what do you run out first, the body, ammo, the guns, the will to fight, revenge; ...  
     have to monitor firearms manufacturing, wholesalers, and distribution; 
     list firearms [and ammo] manufacturers, their capacity, location, market share
     list firearms parts dealer 
•── customs and border protection

•── drug traffickers
     did the drug traffickers do their job?  Yes
•── drug users
     they use the drug; they buy it; the customers; 
     did the drug users do their job?  Yes, if they have one; or no, if they do not have;  
•── public health
     what is going on?
     what is happening?
     how can there be so much cheap crack cocaine on the street in America? 
•── local law enforcement
     what is going on?
     what is happening?
     where are all these crack cocaine coming from?
     spike in crime?  stealing?  burgary?   robbery? 
     so much cash in the business
     firearms on the street 
•── Joe Q public
     what is going on?
     what is happening?
     why am I reading about in the news, media, mainstream media about drug, power cocaine, crack cocaine     
     how come there is so much drug and drug dealers in my neighborhood? 
•── stovepipe (organizational)
     everyone stayed in their lane
     people do their job
     who has the big picture? (CIA, DEA, FBI, DOJ)? 
     how to get the big picture
     does whoever (The System) want Joe Q public to get the big picture? 

source:
        https://snyderlab.com/2018/03/07/wtf-no-neurogenesis-in-humans/
Does adult neurogenesis exist? No, yes, no, yes, yes, no, yes, yes, yes, YES!

Does adult neurogenesis exist in primates? No, no, yes, maybe, yes, yes, YES!

Does neurogenesis occur in the neocortex? No friggin way, yes, no way, yes, no way Jose, yes, DEPENDS WHO YOU ASK.

Does adult neurogenesis happen in humans? Yes, yes, yes, no, WAIT WTF* DID YOU SAY NO???
        https://snyderlab.com/2018/03/07/wtf-no-neurogenesis-in-humans/
   ____________________________________
in an alternative fictional world:
                                   What if in an Orwellean world, (..., the DEA, the FBI, the DOJ) did not do what they say they do, or did not do what the people [Joe Q public] think they (..., the DEA, the FBI, the DOJ) do according to the usual understanding of the law, because the law has become complicated, complex, and political, and can no longer be explained to a five years old or a fifty years old; what if in fact, in practice, and in some aspects (..., the DEA, the FBI, the DOJ) is protecting, and providing cover for the CIA to facilitate their drug trafficking to fund some sort of operations - the political orientation of (..., the DEA, the FBI, the DOJ) - the national security orientation of their organizations, then ... [in complete thought] ... [looking at it like that makes much more sense]

[the EPA : protect the environment (public health) and protect the people in the big corporation and the corporation themselves from Joe Q Public (provide legal cover to industry and big chemical corp for poisoning the air, water, soil, people, and the environment); because ... ] [rules, law, regulation, code of conduct that enable pollution; rules, law, regulation, code of conduct that make it difficult to impossible to hold Big Corp legal liable for pollution that cause harm ]
[the DEA : ... ]
[the FBI : ... ]
[the DOJ : ... ]
[the law : there are at least two aspects to the law, rules, regulation and code of conduct (omission and commission?); one is enable you to do a thing (legal); the other, two is to disable you from doing a thing (make it illegal);  ]
[ if all the law, rules, and regulation were strictly enforced (literal interpretation; there is no such as thing as literal interpretation), then everyone would be jailed and nothing would get done (??); ... ]
   ____________________________________

book "Dark Alliance", author Gary Webb:  What I've attempted to demonstrate in my book was how the collapse of a brutal, pro-American dictatorship in Latin America, combined with a decision by corrupt CIA agents to raise money for a resistance movement by any means necessary, led to the formation of the nation's first major crack market in South Central Los Angeles, which led to the arming and the empowerment of LA's street gangs, which led to the spread of crack to black neighborhoods across the country, and to the passage of racially discriminatory sentencing laws that are locking up thousands of young black men today behind bars for most of their lives.

 •── „ ...  What I've attempted to demonstrate in my book was how the collapse of a brutal, pro-American dictatorship in Latin America, combined with a decision by ... CIA agents to raise money for a resistance movement by any means necessary, led to the formation of the nation's first major crack market in South Central Los Angeles, which led to the arming and the empowerment of LA's street gangs, which led to the spread of crack to black neighborhoods across the country, and to the passage of racially discriminatory sentencing laws that are locking up thousands of young black men today behind bars for most of their lives.  ...“
  ── how the collapse of a pro-American dictatorship in Nicaragua, central America led to thousands of young black men being locked up behind bars for most of their lives?  (Gary Webb)
    ── CIA Connections to Contra Drug Trafficking
       Journalist Gary Webb — January 16, 1999
        https://ourhiddenhistory.org/
        http://www.whale.to/b/webb10.html
    ── Dark Alliance author Gary Webb gave a fascinating talk on the evening of January 16, outlining the findings of his investigation of the CIA's connection to drug trafficking by the Nicaraguan contras. 
       First United Methodist Church in Eugene, Oregon
       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO6oMN8idUQ
       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO6oMN8idUQ

[strong likelihood that CIA facilitation of drug trafficking is much bigger than Gary Webb reporting, with confidence [how confidence]; how much bigger?;  unknown; how long was it happening? ]

Gary Webb:  "... I am more convinced than ever that the U.S. government's responsibility for the drug problems in ... inner cities is greater than I ever wrote in the newspaper.  ..."

Gary Webb:  After spending three years of my life looking into this, I am more convinced than ever that the U.S. government's responsibility for the drug problems in South Central Los Angeles and other inner cities is greater than I ever wrote in the newspaper.
   ____________________________________
Michael V. Hayden, Playing to the edge : American intelligence in the age of terror, 2016

p.231
International Committee of the Red Cross  ICRC 

p.231
International Committee of the Red Cross  ICRC 
ICRC officials became frequent visitors to Langley.
; the Red Cross was all about notification and visitation. 
In one meeting, I was struck by their observation that “CIA often refuses to answer our questions, but when it does, we know the answers are true.”

  (Playing to the edge : American intelligence in the age of terror / Michael V. Hayden, New York : Penguin Press, 2016, (hardback) (ebook), intelligence service──united states. | national security──united states. | united states. central intelligence agency. | united states. national security agency. | biography & autobiography / political. | political science / political freedom & security / intelligence. | history / united states / 21st century., JK468.I6 H39 2016 (print), JK468.I6 (ebook), 327.1273──dc23, 2016, )
   ____________________________________
   ____________________________________
  <--------------------------------------------------------------------------> 

The Elephant in the Boardroom

     Sometimes after the March meeting of the board of directors of Sylvan Forest Products, an elephant came out of the forest and moved into the boardroom. Nobody noticed, until the September meeting when the managing director couldn't open the door. “There's something in there,” said the managing director, “and it's blocking the door.”
     Peering under the door, the comptroller saw the shadow of the elephant's feet. “It looks as if some trees have grown inside. Better send for the silviculturist.”
     The silviculturist managed to splinter the find oak door partway open with his peavey, but the elephant leaned to one side and slammed it shut again. “I don't think it's trees,” said the silviculturist. “It's huge gray monster--more like a whale.”
     The board then sent for a cetaceanologist, who advised them to flood the boardroom so that the whale coudl swim out. But as the room filled with water, the elephant simply blew it out with her trunk through the broken door. Seeing the trunk, the cetaceanologist said, “No wonder it doesn't swim out. It's not a whale at all, but a large snake.”
     Next, the board summoned an ophiologist, who advised, “Toss in some burning oily rags. That will drive out any snake.” But the elephant simply stamped out the flames as fast as the burning rags could be thrown through the door. The board decided to call the janitor to clear the anteroom of splintered wood, muddy water, and oily, smoked furniture.
     The janitor asked about the mess. After the managing director told the story, he reached in his pocket and pulled out some peanuts. When he held one through the door, the elephant--which was by this time mightily hungry--grabbed it with her trunk. “Come on, Little One,” the janitor coaxed, holding out the other peanuts, and in a moment, the elephant lumbered out the door. After feasting a while on peanuts, she shyly retreated to the forest.
     “But how did you know it was an elephant?” the astonished comptroller asked.
     “Oh, I didn't know. I only suspected because it was partly like a forest, partly like a whale, and partly like a snake. It was only a theory, so I figured it would be better to risk one of my peanuts than to cause further damage to your boardroom.”

Out of Your Depth

     If you had an elephant in your boardroom, which specialist would you call? The toughest problems don't come in neatly labeled packages.  Or they come in packages with the wrong labels. That's why they're so tough.
     Three times out of four, consultants find themselves asked to work on problems that aren't their “speciality.” The consultant just looks like a specialist to a nonspecialist. But good consultant can handle many of those problems anyway, because in addition to being specialists, they are problem-solvers. If you dig into their bag of tricks, you'll find that their best ones have nothing whatsoever to do with their specialties, but can be used by consultants in any field.

   (The secrets of consulting, Gerald M. Weinberg, © 1985, pp.37-38)
  <--------------------------------------------------------------------------> 
    look up blind mens groping the elephant story and put it here
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant
  <--------------------------------------------------------------------------> 

“If the database itself is false -- either from careless work or from intentional bias -- it poisons every conclusion which emerges from it. A false database causes innocent analysts of such data to fill the xxxxxxx journals and textbooks with un-knowledge. It renders all its users into agents of possibly deadly mis-information. . . .”
       --Dr. John Gofman 

        Written by John W. Gofman and Egan O'Conner  *14

            “The law of Concentrated Benefit over Diffuse Injury can be stated as follows:”

                “A small, determined group, working energetically for its own narrow interests, can almost always impose an injustice upon a vastly larger group, provided that the larger group believes that the injury is "hypothetical," or distant-in-the-future, or real-but-small relative to the real-and-large cost of preventing it.”  

                [...]

                “Many scholars have written about this extremely important axiom before -- it is not original with us. The fact that narrow special interests are always at work for their own benefit at the expense of others is not at all surprising, given human nature. And it is not surprising that the victims select what appears to be the strategy of least cost to themselves.”
                “The surprising aspect is the failure of so many victims -- especially in peaceful democracies -- to appreciate the aggregate consequences which inevitably accrue, when each small injustice has such a high chance of prevailing.”    

*14  (
       http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/CBoDI.html
         )
  <--------------------------------------------------------------------------> 

 •── Brian Barger and Bob Parry, did their Nicaraguan contra cocaine stories back in the ’80s
      ── https://www.democracynow.org/1997/5/14/san_jose_mercury_news_editor_claims

 •── Reporter Jesse Katz, who two years prior had written a profile of “Freeway Rick” Ross describing him as “a criminal mastermind…most responsible for flooding Los Angeles streets with mass-marketed cocaine” did a complete about face and characterized Ross as just one small player in a sprawling landscape of L.A. crack dealers. “How the crack epidemic reached that extreme, on some level, had nothing to do with Ross,” he wrote.

 •── a mostly ignored Associate Press report from 1985 and a House Subcommittee from 1989 that found that “U.S. officials involved in Central America failed to address the drug issue for fear of jeopardizing the war efforts against Nicaragua.”

 ── https://www.textise.net/showText.aspx?strURL=https%253A//allthatsinteresting.com/gary-webb
   ____________________________________
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicaragua

Nicaraguan Revolution (1960s–1990)

United States–supported anti-Sandinista "Contra" rebels (ARDE Frente Sur) in 1987
In 1961, Carlos Fonseca looked back to the historical figure of Sandino, and along with two other people (one of whom was believed to be Casimiro Sotelo, who was later assassinated), founded the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN).[63] After the 1972 earthquake and Somoza's apparent corruption, the ranks of the Sandinistas were flooded with young disaffected Nicaraguans who no longer had anything to lose.[80]

In December 1974, a group of the FSLN, in an attempt to kidnap U.S. ambassador Turner Shelton, held some Managuan partygoers hostage (after killing the host, former agriculture minister, Jose Maria Castillo), until the Somozan government met their demands for a large ransom and free transport to Cuba. Somoza granted this, then subsequently sent his national guard out into the countryside to look for the kidnappers, described by opponents of the kidnapping as "terrorists".[81]

On January 10, 1978, Pedro Joaquín Chamorro Cardenal, the editor of the national newspaper La Prensa and ardent opponent of Somoza, was assassinated.[82] It is alleged that the planners and perpetrators of the murder were at the highest echelons of the Somoza regime.[82]

The Sandinistas forcefully took power in July 1979, ousting Somoza, and prompting the exodus of the majority of Nicaragua's middle class, wealthy landowners, and professionals, many of whom settled in the United States.[83][84][85] The Carter administration decided to work with the new government, while attaching a provision for aid forfeiture if it was found to be assisting insurgencies in neighboring countries.[86] Somoza fled the country and eventually ended up in Paraguay, where he was assassinated in September 1980, allegedly by members of the Argentinian Revolutionary Workers' Party.[87]

In 1980, the Carter administration provided $60 million in aid to Nicaragua under the Sandinistas, but the aid was suspended when the administration obtained evidence of Nicaraguan shipment of arms to El Salvadoran rebels.[88] Most people sided with Nicaragua against the Sandinistas.[89] In response to the coming to power of the Sandinistas, various rebel groups collectively known as the "Contras" were formed to oppose the new government. The Reagan administration authorized the CIA to help the Contra rebels with funding, weapons and training.[90] The Contras operated from camps in the neighboring countries of Honduras to the north and Costa Rica to the south.[90]

10th anniversary of the Nicaraguan revolution in Managua, 1989

They engaged in a systematic campaign of terror among rural Nicaraguans to disrupt the social reform projects of the Sandinistas. Several historians have criticized the Contra campaign and the Reagan administration's support for the Contras, citing the brutality and numerous human rights violations of the Contras. LaRamee and Polakoff, for example, describe the destruction of health centers, schools, and cooperatives at the hands of the rebels,[91] and others have contended that murder, rape, and torture occurred on a large scale in Contra-dominated areas.[92] The U.S. also carried out a campaign of economic sabotage, and disrupted shipping by planting underwater mines in Nicaragua's port of Corinto,[93] an action condemned by the International Court of Justice as illegal.[94] The court also found that the U.S. encouraged acts contrary to humanitarian law by producing the manual Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare and disseminating it to the Contras.[95] The manual, among other things, advised on how to rationalize killings of civilians.[96] The U.S. also sought to place economic pressure on the Sandinistas, and the Reagan administration imposed a full trade embargo.[97]

 •── The U.S. also carried out a campaign of economic sabotage, and disrupted shipping by planting underwater mines in Nicaragua's port of Corinto,[93]
      ([ did this work?  was shipping disrupted?  did any ship got blowed up by the mine?  how did they demined the habour?  How was this found out by the public?  A ship got blow up? ])
      ([ what if there an economic sabotage happening inside the the u.s.?; how would you determine this?;  would afford ability, avail ability, access ability, plenty of housing, jobs, and education be considered as  economic sabotage or is that competition or the nature of ... ])
 •── The U.S. also sought to place economic pressure on the Sandinistas, and the Reagan administration imposed a full trade embargo.[97]

The Sandinistas were also accused of human rights abuses including torture, disappearances and mass executions.[98][99] The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights investigated abuses by Sandinista forces, including an execution of 35 to 40 Miskitos in December 1981,[100] and an execution of 75 people in November 1984.[101]

In the Nicaraguan general elections of 1984, which were judged by at least one visiting 30-person delegation of NGO representatives to have been free and fair,[102] the Sandinistas won the parliamentary election and their leader Daniel Ortega won the presidential election.[103] The Reagan administration criticized the elections as a "sham" based on the claim that Arturo Cruz, the candidate nominated by the Coordinadora Democrática Nicaragüense, comprising three right wing political parties, did not participate in the elections. However, the administration privately argued against Cruz's participation for fear that his involvement would legitimize the elections, and thus weaken the case for American aid to the Contras.[104] According to Martin Kriele, the results of the election were rigged.[105][106][107][108]

In 1983 the U.S. Congress prohibited federal funding of the Contras, but the Reagan administration illegally continued to back them by covertly selling arms to Iran and channeling the proceeds to the Contras in the Iran–Contra affair, for which several members of the Reagan administration were convicted of felonies.[109] The International Court of Justice, in regard to the case of Nicaragua v. United States in 1986, found, "the United States of America was under an obligation to make reparation to the Republic of Nicaragua for all injury caused to Nicaragua by certain breaches of obligations under customary international law and treaty-law committed by the United States of America".[110] During the war between the Contras and the Sandinistas, 30,000 people were killed.[111]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicaragua
   ____________________________________
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_involvement_in_Contra_cocaine_trafficking

Central Intelligence Agency

A number of writers have alleged that the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was involved in the Nicaraguan Contras' cocaine trafficking operations during the 1980s Nicaraguan civil war. These claims have led to investigations by the United States government, including hearings and reports by the United States House of Representatives, Senate, Department of Justice, and the CIA's Office of the Inspector General which ultimately concluded the allegations were unsupported. The subject remains controversial.

A 1986 investigation by a sub-committee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (the Kerry Committee), found that "the Contra drug links included", among other connections, "[...] payments to drug traffickers by the U.S. State Department of funds authorized by the Congress for humanitarian assistance to the Contras, in some cases after the traffickers had been indicted by federal law enforcement agencies on drug charges, in others while traffickers were under active investigation by these same agencies."[1]  ([ the us state department were paying drug traffickers for humanitarian assistance to the Contras, because they were transporting firearms, ammo, and other things - also known as humanitarian assistance - to the Contras; and because ... (?); and ... ])

The charges of CIA involvement in Contra cocaine trafficking were revived in 1996, when a newspaper series by reporter Gary Webb in the San Jose Mercury News claimed that the trafficking had played an important role in the creation of the crack cocaine drug problem in the United States. Webb's series led to three federal investigations, all of which concluded there was no evidence of a conspiracy by CIA officials or its employees to bring drugs into the United States.[2][3][4]  ([ there is no conspiracy because the CIA was doing service support as part of the operation to make sure the drug trafficking was going smoothly. ]) However, in the CIA report, it was also found that CIA assets had been trafficking narcotics to fund the Contra rebels.[5] The agency was aware of this trafficking, and (in some cases) dissuaded the DEA and other agencies from investigating the Contra supply networks involved.[6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_involvement_in_Contra_cocaine_trafficking
   ____________________________________
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_CIA_drug_trafficking

United States

U.S. Government Officials said in 1990 the Anti-Drug Unit of the C.I.A. "accidentally" shipped a ton of cocaine into the United States from Venezuela as part of an effort to infiltrate and gather evidence on drug gangs. The cocaine was sold on the streets in the United States. No criminal charges were made in this incident, however C.I.A. officer Mark McFarlin resigned and another C.I.A. officer was disciplined. The CIA issued a statement on the incident saying there was "poor judgment and management on the part of several C.I.A. officers".[13]

Mark McFarlin 

During a PBS Frontline investigation, DEA field agent Hector Berrellez said, "I believe that elements working for the CIA were involved in bringing drugs into the country."

"I know specifically that some of the CIA contract workers, meaning some of the pilots, in fact were bringing drugs into the U.S. and landing some of these drugs in government military air bases. And I know so because I was told by some of these pilots that in fact they had done that."[14]


Venezuela

A failed CIA anti-drug operation in Venezuela resulted in at least a ton of cocaine being smuggled into the United States and sold on the streets. The incident, which was first made public in 1993, was part of a plan to assist an undercover agent to gain the confidence of a Colombian drug cartel. The plan involved the unsupervised shipment of hundreds of pounds of cocaine from Venezuela. The drug in the shipments was provided by the Venezuelan anti-drug unit which was working with the CIA, using cocaine seized in Venezuela. The shipments took place despite the objections of the U.S. DEA. When the failed plan came to light, the CIA officer in charge of the operation resigned, and his supervisor was transferred.[28]


Mexico

In October 2013, two former federal agents and an ex-CIA contractor told an American television network that CIA operatives were involved in the kidnapping and murder of DEA covert agent Enrique Camarena, because he was a threat to the agency's drug operations in Mexico in the 1980s. According to the three men, the CIA was collaborating with drug traffickers moving cocaine and marijuana to the United States, and using its share of the profits to finance Nicaraguan Contra rebels attempting to overthrow Nicaragua's Sandinista government. The CIA spokesman responding to the allegation called it "ridiculous" to suggest that the agency had anything to do with the murder of a US federal agent or the escape of his alleged killer.[23]


Panama

The U.S. invasion of Panama after which president Manuel Noriega was captured.

In 1989, the United States invaded Panama as part of Operation Just Cause, which involved 25,000 American troops. General Manuel Noriega, head of Panama's government, had been giving military assistance to Contra groups in Nicaragua at the request of the U.S.—which, in exchange, allowed him to continue his drug-trafficking activities—which they had known about since the 1960s.[26][27] When the DEA tried to indict Noriega in 1971, the CIA prevented them from doing so.[26] The CIA, which was then directed by future president George H. W. Bush, provided Noriega with hundreds of thousands of dollars per year as payment for his work in Latin America.[26] However, when CIA pilot Eugene Hasenfus was shot down over Nicaragua by the Sandinistas, documents aboard the plane revealed many of the CIA's activities in Latin America, and the CIA's connections with Noriega became a public relations "liability" for the U.S. government, which finally allowed the DEA to indict him for drug trafficking, after decades of allowing his drug operations to proceed unchecked.[26]

Eugene Hasenfus (CIA pilot) 

Afghanistan

For eight years, (until October 2009), Ahmed Wali Karzai, brother of the then-newly elected President of Afghanistan Hamid Karzai, was on the payroll of the CIA - but is also alleged to have been involved in opium trafficking in the Middle East.[31][32]

Alfred McCoy has argued that the CIA had fostered heroin production in Afghanistan for decades to finance operations aimed at containing the spread of communism, and later to finance operations aimed at containing the spread of the Islamic state.[33] McCoy alleges that the CIA protects local warlords and incentivises them to become drug lords. In his book "Politics of Heroin",[34] McCoy alleges CIA complicity in the global drug trade in Afghanistan, Southeast Asia, Central America, Columbia, argueing that the CIA follows a similar pattern in all their drug involvement.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_CIA_drug_trafficking
   ____________________________________


THE ILLEGAL DRUG RACKET (DOPE INC)
[back] Fascist   [back] the secret government  Psychopaths (Mafia)  Rackets (Conspiracies)

['Narcotics are estimated to be worth between $500 billion and $1 trillion a year, an amount greater than the global oil and gas industry, and twice as large as the overall automobile industry'.1 Similar to Pharma sales. The idea that a security apparatus with a yearly $400 Billion budget (USA) & trillion dollar hardware can't stop illegal drugs entering the country and being sold on the streets is absolutely ludicrous.  Illegal drugs are a main earner for the secret government (from when the British lorded the trade with the East India Company and forced Opium on the Chinese  "in one year the opium trade with China was three times the profits of the combined profits of Ford and General Motors in 1970 and this was shared by 300 people.  That was the committee that ran the East India Company" ---John Coleman), alongside their huge income from the more addictive, and harder to quit Pharmaceutical ones, to which they purposefully addict children (3.6 million children on ADHD drugs in the United States, 1.6 million of those are taking more than one psychiatric drug in 2005. 1 ) and adults 1 , while suppressing non-drug cures and detox therapies 1 2. 
    Drugs also are used as weapons to destroy a society with crime, debt and cut any connection to thinking and the spiritual circuits 1 2.  The more drugs you sell the more you control people.  Satan's closed circle.  Up to 50% of prisoners can be dependent on heroin, cocaine and/or alcohol, so the prisons are half full due to Dope Inc not to mention most robberies to feed the habit.]
   ____________________________________
   ────────────────────────────────────
   ____________________________________
   ────────────────────────────────────