aerial view of WTC neighborhood satellite real time and archive images
crowd sourcing video footage
crowd sourcing digital image, photographs
others
before the demolition
the same for Pentagon
historical reconstruction
source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WTC_Area_With_Building_Numbers_50dpi_contrast.jpg
does the following looked like two airplane crashed into the two buildings, and then the buildings collapse all on its own?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WTC_Area_With_Building_Numbers_50dpi_contrast.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories
____________________________________
Ed Catmull with Amy Wallace, creativity, inc., 2014 [ ]
p.177
The problem is, the phrase is dead wrong. Hindsight is not 20-20. Not even close. Our view of the past, in fact, is hardly clearer than our view of the future. While we know more about a past event than a future one, our understanding of the factors that shaped it is severely limited. Not only that, because we THINK we see what happened clearly--hindsight being 20-20 and all--we often aren't open to knowing more. ...[...]... The past should be our teacher, not our master.
p.178
We build our story--our model of the past--as best we can. We may seek our other people's memories and examine our own limited records to come up with a better model. Even then, it is still only a model--not reality.
(creativity, inc. : overcoming the unseen forces that stand in the way of true inspiration / Ed Catmull with Amy Wallace., 1. creativity ability in business2. corporate culture, 3. organizational effectiveness, 4. pixar (firm), © 2014 by Edwin Catmull, 658.4071 Catmull, p.177, p.178)
____________________________________
[model]
[reality]
[models]
[a simplified representation of reality]
[no models is completely true.]
[create a model that is useful for some specific purpose, for answering a specific set of interrelated questions.]
Donella Meadows, Jorgen Randers, and Dennis Meadows, Limits to growth, 2004
15. Donella Meadows
pp.130-131
The Purpose and Structure of World3
... Seldon, and his emperor.
"I am given to understand you believe it possible
to predict the future."
Seldon suddenly felt weary. It seemed as though
this misinterpretation of his theory was constantly
going to occur. Perhaps he should not have presented
his paper.
He said, "Not quite, actually. What I have done is
much more limited than that.... What I have done ...
is to show that ... it is possible to choose a starting
point and to make appropriate assumptions that will
suppress the chaos. That will make it possible to predict
the future, not in full detail, of course, but in broad
sweeps; not with certainty ..."
The Emperor, who had listened carefully said, "But
doesn't that mean that you have shown how to predict
the future?" 1
In the remainder of this book we will often use World3 to generate scenarios that help us talk about the "broad sweeps" of the future. To minimize confusion about our goals, we start with several definitions and cautionary notes about models.
A model is a simplified representation of reality. If it were a perfect replica, it would not be useful. For example, a road map would be of no use to drivers if it contained every feature of the landscape it represents--it focuses on roads and omits, for example, most features of buildings and plants along the way. A small physical airplane model can be useful for exploring the dynamics of a particular airfoil in a wind tunnel, but it gives no information about the comfort of passengers in the eventual operational plane. A painting is a graphic model that may convey a mood or the physical placement of features on a landscape. But it does not answer any questions about the cost or the insulation of the buildings it portrays. To deal with those issues a different graphic model would be required--an architect's construction blue print. Because models are always simplifications, they are never perfectly valid; no models is completely true.
Instead the goal is to create a model that is useful for some specific purpose, for answering a specific set of interrelated questions. Then one must keep in mind the limitations of the model and be aware of all the questions it does not answer. We have focused our efforts on making World3 useful--for a carefully bounded set of questions about long-term physical growth on the planet. Unfortunately, that means World3 will not provide useful answers to most of the questions that concern you.
Models take many forms--common forms are mental, verbal, graphical, mathematical, or physical. For example, many words in this book are verbal models. GROWTH, POPULATION, FOREST, and WATER are just symbols, simple verbal representations that stand for very complex realities. Every graph, chart, map, and photograph is a graphical model. Its relationships are expressed through the appearance and location of objects on the paper. World3 is a mathematical model. The relationships it contains are represented through a set of mathematical model. The relationships it contains are represented through a set of mathematical equations. We have not used physical models in our effort to understand growth and limits, though they are useful for many other purposes, such as in designing communities or industrial products.
Mental models are the abstractions carried in minds. They are not directly accessible by others; they are informal. Formal models exist in a form that can be directly viewed, and sometimes manipulated, by others. The two should ideally interact. Using formal models, we can learn more about reality and about others' mental models. And that enriches our own mental models. As we learn, we are able to create more useful formal models. That process of iteration has engaged us for more than 30 years. And this book is one result.
To create this book, we have assembled words, data, graphs, and computer scenarios. The book is a model of what is in our minds, and creating it has altered what we know. This text is our best attempt to symbolize our current thoughts and understanding about physical growth on this planet over the coming century. But this book is only a model of those thoughts, which are themselves, like every person's thoughts, only a models of the "real world."
1 Isaac Asimov, Prelude to Foundation (New York: Doubleday, 1988), 10.
(Meadows, Donella H., copyright © 2004)
(Limits to growth : the 30-year update / Donella Meadows, Jorgen Randers, and Dennis Meadows, (hardcover : alk. paper), (pbk. : alk. paper), 1. economic development--environmental aspects, 2. population--economic aspects, 3. pollution--economic aspects, 4. sustainable development, pp.130-131 )
____________________________________
<-------------------------------------------------------------------------->
page 53/307 (pdf)
The map is not the reality (Alfred Korzybski)
... human being do not react to reality, but build their own mental model of reality.
... ... ...
Accepting this scientific fact has fundamental consequences: the mental models of individuals who meet and try to exchange information never match - virtually never! But people have the ability to widen their mental models through and understanding of other people's.
page 58/307 (pdf)
It goes without saying that many generalisations result in incorrect/erroneous judgments. This is one of the major traps of thinking. We are ready to accept information given to us without crosschecking, if it fits into our mental model.
page 61/307 (pdf)
At the start of a consultantcy assignment, the client usually focuses on his problems, often having deficit orientated perceptions of this working environment (such as team problems, etc.). As a result, adaptive behavioural patterns aren't explored.
page 61/307 (pdf)
An analysis of group processes reveals that hypnotic patterns are self-generating and that on an unconscious level all actors contribute to the problem state: they hypnotize themselves.
source:
The change management toolbook : a collection of tools, methods and strategies, by Holger Nauheimer
https://www.nccmt.ca/uploads/media/media/0001/03/1a75f61d353397066eb0e83a0da69d2fd8ee2ef4.pdf
1a75f61d353397066eb0e83a0da69d2fd8ee2ef4.pdf
was save as : change management toolbook.pdf
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZQYEwIfE7lzwHwa7jngoOLYQdA5QwGt2/view?usp=sharing
____________________________________
https://todayilearnreadingroom.blogspot.com/2023/06/johari-window.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johari_window
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_are_unknown_unknowns
https://todayilearnreadingroom.blogspot.com/2023/06/johari-window.html
crowd sourcing video footage
crowd sourcing digital image, photographs
others
before the demolition
the same for Pentagon
historical reconstruction
source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WTC_Area_With_Building_Numbers_50dpi_contrast.jpg
does the following looked like two airplane crashed into the two buildings, and then the buildings collapse all on its own?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WTC_Area_With_Building_Numbers_50dpi_contrast.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories
____________________________________
Ed Catmull with Amy Wallace, creativity, inc., 2014 [ ]
p.177
The problem is, the phrase is dead wrong. Hindsight is not 20-20. Not even close. Our view of the past, in fact, is hardly clearer than our view of the future. While we know more about a past event than a future one, our understanding of the factors that shaped it is severely limited. Not only that, because we THINK we see what happened clearly--hindsight being 20-20 and all--we often aren't open to knowing more. ...[...]... The past should be our teacher, not our master.
p.178
We build our story--our model of the past--as best we can. We may seek our other people's memories and examine our own limited records to come up with a better model. Even then, it is still only a model--not reality.
(creativity, inc. : overcoming the unseen forces that stand in the way of true inspiration / Ed Catmull with Amy Wallace., 1. creativity ability in business2. corporate culture, 3. organizational effectiveness, 4. pixar (firm), © 2014 by Edwin Catmull, 658.4071 Catmull, p.177, p.178)
____________________________________
[model]
[reality]
[models]
[a simplified representation of reality]
[no models is completely true.]
[create a model that is useful for some specific purpose, for answering a specific set of interrelated questions.]
Donella Meadows, Jorgen Randers, and Dennis Meadows, Limits to growth, 2004
15. Donella Meadows
pp.130-131
The Purpose and Structure of World3
... Seldon, and his emperor.
"I am given to understand you believe it possible
to predict the future."
Seldon suddenly felt weary. It seemed as though
this misinterpretation of his theory was constantly
going to occur. Perhaps he should not have presented
his paper.
He said, "Not quite, actually. What I have done is
much more limited than that.... What I have done ...
is to show that ... it is possible to choose a starting
point and to make appropriate assumptions that will
suppress the chaos. That will make it possible to predict
the future, not in full detail, of course, but in broad
sweeps; not with certainty ..."
The Emperor, who had listened carefully said, "But
doesn't that mean that you have shown how to predict
the future?" 1
In the remainder of this book we will often use World3 to generate scenarios that help us talk about the "broad sweeps" of the future. To minimize confusion about our goals, we start with several definitions and cautionary notes about models.
A model is a simplified representation of reality. If it were a perfect replica, it would not be useful. For example, a road map would be of no use to drivers if it contained every feature of the landscape it represents--it focuses on roads and omits, for example, most features of buildings and plants along the way. A small physical airplane model can be useful for exploring the dynamics of a particular airfoil in a wind tunnel, but it gives no information about the comfort of passengers in the eventual operational plane. A painting is a graphic model that may convey a mood or the physical placement of features on a landscape. But it does not answer any questions about the cost or the insulation of the buildings it portrays. To deal with those issues a different graphic model would be required--an architect's construction blue print. Because models are always simplifications, they are never perfectly valid; no models is completely true.
Instead the goal is to create a model that is useful for some specific purpose, for answering a specific set of interrelated questions. Then one must keep in mind the limitations of the model and be aware of all the questions it does not answer. We have focused our efforts on making World3 useful--for a carefully bounded set of questions about long-term physical growth on the planet. Unfortunately, that means World3 will not provide useful answers to most of the questions that concern you.
Models take many forms--common forms are mental, verbal, graphical, mathematical, or physical. For example, many words in this book are verbal models. GROWTH, POPULATION, FOREST, and WATER are just symbols, simple verbal representations that stand for very complex realities. Every graph, chart, map, and photograph is a graphical model. Its relationships are expressed through the appearance and location of objects on the paper. World3 is a mathematical model. The relationships it contains are represented through a set of mathematical model. The relationships it contains are represented through a set of mathematical equations. We have not used physical models in our effort to understand growth and limits, though they are useful for many other purposes, such as in designing communities or industrial products.
Mental models are the abstractions carried in minds. They are not directly accessible by others; they are informal. Formal models exist in a form that can be directly viewed, and sometimes manipulated, by others. The two should ideally interact. Using formal models, we can learn more about reality and about others' mental models. And that enriches our own mental models. As we learn, we are able to create more useful formal models. That process of iteration has engaged us for more than 30 years. And this book is one result.
To create this book, we have assembled words, data, graphs, and computer scenarios. The book is a model of what is in our minds, and creating it has altered what we know. This text is our best attempt to symbolize our current thoughts and understanding about physical growth on this planet over the coming century. But this book is only a model of those thoughts, which are themselves, like every person's thoughts, only a models of the "real world."
1 Isaac Asimov, Prelude to Foundation (New York: Doubleday, 1988), 10.
(Meadows, Donella H., copyright © 2004)
(Limits to growth : the 30-year update / Donella Meadows, Jorgen Randers, and Dennis Meadows, (hardcover : alk. paper), (pbk. : alk. paper), 1. economic development--environmental aspects, 2. population--economic aspects, 3. pollution--economic aspects, 4. sustainable development, pp.130-131 )
____________________________________
<-------------------------------------------------------------------------->
page 53/307 (pdf)
The map is not the reality (Alfred Korzybski)
... human being do not react to reality, but build their own mental model of reality.
... ... ...
Accepting this scientific fact has fundamental consequences: the mental models of individuals who meet and try to exchange information never match - virtually never! But people have the ability to widen their mental models through and understanding of other people's.
page 58/307 (pdf)
It goes without saying that many generalisations result in incorrect/erroneous judgments. This is one of the major traps of thinking. We are ready to accept information given to us without crosschecking, if it fits into our mental model.
page 61/307 (pdf)
At the start of a consultantcy assignment, the client usually focuses on his problems, often having deficit orientated perceptions of this working environment (such as team problems, etc.). As a result, adaptive behavioural patterns aren't explored.
page 61/307 (pdf)
An analysis of group processes reveals that hypnotic patterns are self-generating and that on an unconscious level all actors contribute to the problem state: they hypnotize themselves.
source:
The change management toolbook : a collection of tools, methods and strategies, by Holger Nauheimer
https://www.nccmt.ca/uploads/media/media/0001/03/1a75f61d353397066eb0e83a0da69d2fd8ee2ef4.pdf
1a75f61d353397066eb0e83a0da69d2fd8ee2ef4.pdf
was save as : change management toolbook.pdf
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZQYEwIfE7lzwHwa7jngoOLYQdA5QwGt2/view?usp=sharing
____________________________________
https://todayilearnreadingroom.blogspot.com/2023/06/johari-window.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johari_window
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_are_unknown_unknowns
https://todayilearnreadingroom.blogspot.com/2023/06/johari-window.html
____________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment